Construction Article on Abbey Healthcare Collateral Warranties

The Supreme Court in Abbey Healthcare v Augusta [2024] UKSC 23 held that most collateral warranties do not qualify as construction contracts under the Housing Grants, Construction & Regeneration Act 1996, meaning they generally do not carry a statutory right to adjudication unless they contain explicit obligations to carry out construction operations for the beneficiary.
Created: 7 April 2025
Last Reviewed: 7 April 2025

Collateral Warranties in Construction Contracts

The Supreme Court has recently clarified the law regarding collateral warranties and whether they are ‘construction contracts’ under the Housing, Grants, Construction & Regeneration Act 1996, in its judgment in the case of Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd v Augusta 2008 LLP (formerly Simply Construct (UK) LLP) [2024] UKSC 23. B P Collins’ construction law team explores why the case has significant implications with regard to whether the statutory right to adjudication will be available to parties to a collateral warranty.

Construction Contracts and Collateral Warranties

A construction contract is widely defined by section 104 of the Act as an agreement with a person for any of the following:

  • the carrying out of construction operations;
  • arranging for the carrying out of construction operations by others, whether under a sub-contract or otherwise;

Membership Required
to View

Member Login Become a member
This document is only available for members

Want to view this?

Unlock this document and get unlimited access to our entire library of resources and training courses.

Already a member? Login

Become a member
Forgot Password?